Table of Contents
Last Updated: November 1, 2025
Estimated reading time: ~6 minutes
Word count: 1391
The heart of any taxonomic thesis is the “Systematic Account”—the detailed, methodical description of organisms new to science. The 1982 thesis “Studies on Helminth Parasites of Indian Fishes” excels here, presenting a portfolio of New Trematode Species in Indian Fish. This summary breaks down the “how” and “why” of these descriptions, focusing on key examples from the text’s core scientific contributions.
- Examines new species from both marine and freshwater hosts.
- Provides detailed morphological measurements using a Camera lucida.
- Justifies each new species by comparing it to its closest known relatives.
- Establishes a new genus, Pseudoanisocoelium, and a new subfamily.
- Names new species in honor of prominent scientists and based on host fish.
Studies on Helminth Parasites of Indian Fishes
1. Describing a New Marine Fluke (Paramphistomidae)
The thesis begins its systematic account with Helostomatis fotedari n.sp., a parasite found in the intestine of the marine fish Stromateus cinereus (Silver Pomfret) collected at Quilon, Kerala.
“The new form differs from all these forms in having genital pore just behind the bifurcation of oral diverticula and in the extension of vitellaria from hind end of oral diverticula upto a little behind the intestinal caeca.” (Tandon, 1982, p. 92).
This description exemplifies the taxonomic process. The researcher, Vijay Laxmi Tandon, identifies a specimen and meticulously compares it to all known species in the genus Helostomatis (H. helostomatis, H. sakrei, etc.). She finds unique features—specifically the position of the genital pore and the unique starting and ending points of the vitellaria (yolk glands)—that are not present in any other described species. This rigorous comparison provides the necessary justification to declare it a “new species” (n.sp.). The work also provides precise measurements for the body, oral sucker, and testes, ensuring future researchers can identify it.
Student Note: The “n.sp.” abbreviation stands for nova species, Latin for “new species.” A new species designation must always be justified by a “Discussion” or “Diagnosis” section that compares it against the most closely related species.
Professor’s Insight: Naming a species is a formal honor. This species, fotedari, was “named in honour of Dr. D.N. Fotedar, Professor of Zoology, P.G. College, Kashmir University,” a respected colleague. This is a common and important tradition in taxonomy.
2. A New Genus: Pseudoanisocoelium n.g.
One of the most significant findings in this thesis is the discovery of a parasite so unique it required not just a new species, but an entirely new genus (n.g.) and even a new subfamily (n.subf.): Pseudoanisocoelium dorabi.
“The present form does not fit into any of these subfamilies of Acanthostomidae and hence a new subfamily Pseudoanisocoelinae is created for the reception of the present form Pseudoanisocoelium dorabi n.g., n.sp.” (Tandon, 1982, p. 157).
The author found that this parasite, collected from the fish Chirocentrus dorab, had a combination of traits that excluded it from all known genera within the family Acanthostomidae. Key differences included the absence of circumoral spines, a ‘Y’ shaped excretory vesicle, post-equatorial testes, and the complete absence of a receptaculum seminis. Because no existing category could house it, the author formally proposed “Pseudoanisocoelinae n.subf.” and “Pseudoanisocoelium n.g.” with detailed “Subfamily diagnosis” and “Generic diagnosis” to validate these new taxonomic ranks.
Student Note: A “n.g.” (nova genus or new genus) is a major taxonomic event. It signifies that the organism’s fundamental body plan is significantly different from any previously described genus.
Professor’s Insight: This is a bold and important taxonomic move for a PhD thesis. It demonstrates a deep understanding of the family’s complex systematics. The new subfamily “Pseudoanisocoelinae” is aptly named for its superficial resemblance to the existing subfamily Anisocoelinae, while “Pseudo” (false) highlights the critical differences.
| New Species/Genus | Host Fish | Location in Host | Key Diagnostic Feature(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Helostomatis fotedari n.sp. | Stromateus cinereus | Intestine | Genital pore position; extent of vitellaria. |
| Gyliauchen indicum n.sp. | Engraulis hemiltoni | Intestine | Absence of oesophageal glands; testes close to ventral sucker. |
| Opisthomonorcheides yamagutii n.sp. | Psettodes erumei | Intestine | Unlobed ovary; genital atrium close to ventral sucker. |
| Opisthomonorcheides engraulisi n.sp. | Engraulis mystax | Intestine | Trilobed ovary; genital atrium far from ventral sucker. |
| Acanthocolpus thapari n.sp. | Glyphidodon bengalensis | Intestine | Vitellaria confluent anterior to ovary. |
| Acanthocolpus caranxi n.sp. | Caranx kalla | Intestine | Genital pore lateral, at middle of pharynx. |
| Pseudoanisocoelium dorabi n.g., n.sp. | Chirocentrus dorab | Intestine | New genus. No circumoral spines; ‘Y’ shaped bladder; no receptaculum seminis. |
Table 1. A selection of new marine trematode species described in the 1982 thesis, highlighting their hosts and key distinguishing features.
3. Describing New Freshwater Species (Allocreadiidae)
A prime example is Allocreadium catlai n.sp., a new species of the family Allocreadiidae found in one of India’s most important carp species, Catla catla.
“The new form has a close resemblance to A. kamali but can be distinguished from it in having anterior testis smaller than posterior testis, in the position of ovary, receptaculum seminis and ootype, in the position of genital pore and in the absence of prepharynx.” (Tandon, 1982, p. 236).
This description demonstrates the fine-level observation required for taxonomy. The author notes the parasite is in the genus Allocreadium and is closest to a known species, A. kamali. Differences in the size of testes, the arrangement of female reproductive organs, genital pore location, and absence of a prepharynx define it as a new species, named A. catlai after its host.
Student Note: In trematode taxonomy, the relative position and size of the testes and ovary are key diagnostic features.
Professor’s Insight: Discovering a parasite like A. catlai in an important aquaculture species has practical implications. Taxonomy is the first step before studying life cycle, pathogenicity, or treatments.
4. Differentiating Closely Related Species
The thesis provides an example differentiating two species within the same genus: O. yamagutii n.sp. and O. engraulisi n.sp.
“The new form [O. yamagutii] differs from all these forms except O. decapteri in having unlobed ovary… The new form [O. engraulisi] has a close resemblance with O. apogonichthysi… but differs from it in having trilobed ovary instead of tetra-lobed ovary…” (Tandon, 1982, pp. 112, 115).
This comparative morphology clearly separates the species. A key was developed (p. 116). O. yamagutii has an unlobed ovary; O. engraulisi has a trilobed ovary, making species separation unambiguous.
Student Note: A taxonomic key functions like a flowchart, leading researchers to correct species identification.
Professor’s Insight: O. engraulisi is named after its host genus, Engraulis, while O. yamagutii honors Dr. S. Yamaguti.
This review was prepared by the Professor of Zoology editorial team. All content, apart from direct quotations, is original analysis written to provide educational context for students and researchers.
Note: This summary was drafted with AI assistance and was thoroughly reviewed, edited, and verified for accuracy by a human editor.
This educational summary is based on a publicly available academic thesis. The original author, Vijay Laxmi Tandon, retains the full copyright to the thesis.
Key Takeaways
- The 1982 thesis’ “Systematic Account” provides formal descriptions of New Trematode Species in Indian Fish.
- Each species is justified by detailed discussion comparing it with other known species in its genus.
- A new genus and subfamily (Pseudoanisocoelium dorabi n.g., n.sp., Pseudoanisocoelinae n.subf.) were proposed.
- Freshwater species like Allocreadium catlai and Pleurogenes attui were described.
- Marine species like Helostomatis fotedari and Acanthocolpus thapari were detailed.
- Precise morphological features (ovary shape, vitellaria extent, genital pore position) differentiate species.
MCQs (Multiple Choice Questions)
- 1. What does “n.g., n.sp.” stand for in a taxonomic paper?
- a) New group, new specimen
- b) Nova genus, nova species (new genus, new species)
- c) Non-genetic, non-specific
- d) New guide, new supplement
- 2. The new species Helostomatis fotedari was named in honor of:
- a) Its host fish, Stromateus cinereus
- b) Its supervisor, Dr. S.P. Gupta
- c) A respected zoologist, Dr. D.N. Fotedar
- d) The collection locality, Quilon
- 3. What key feature was used to distinguish O. yamagutii n.sp. from O. engraulisi n.sp.?
- a) The shape of the ovary (unlobed vs. trilobed)
- b) The presence or absence of a pharynx
- c) The number of testes (one vs. two)
- d) The presence of circumoral spines
FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)
- What is a “Systematic Account”? It is the formal section of a taxonomic paper that describes each species in detail, following a standardized structure (morphology, measurements, host, locality, and discussion).
- What is a “holotype”? The single physical specimen upon which the description and name of a new species are based.
- Why are organ measurements so important? Precise measurements (e.g., “0.35 mm long, 0.40 mm wide”) allow scientists to confirm identification and compare specimens.
- What is a “taxonomic key”? A diagnostic tool with paired choices based on morphology that leads to correct species identification.
- Why name species after people or places? It honors contributions to science or identifies the host or location.
Lab / Practical Note
Illustrations are as important as text. The thesis used a Camera lucida for all diagrams, ensuring accurate proportions of internal organs. Always label key diagnostic structures clearly.
External Resources
Primary Source: Tandon, V. L. (1982). Studies on Helminth Parasites of Indian Fishes. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, India.
Pages Used for this Summary: 1, 82, 90, 92-94, 108, 112, 115-117, 120-122, 154-157, 190-192, 225, 234-236.
Note: Page citations refer to printed thesis pages, not PDF page numbers.
Discover more from Professor Of Zoology
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
