Table of Contents
Last Updated: October 28, 2025
Estimated reading time: ~7 minutes
A crucial component of any parasitological survey is the comprehensive documentation of host-parasite associations. V.L. Tandon’s 1982 PhD thesis provided an exhaustive checklist of helminth parasites found in Indian fishes, offering foundational data on which fish species are affected, the types of parasites they harbor, and the geographical and anatomical sites of infection.
- Establishes the ecological importance of systematic host-parasite record keeping.
- Compares the helminth fauna found in various freshwater and marine fish hosts.
- Highlights common anatomical sites of infection for different parasite groups.
- Illustrates the diversity of fish species examined across different Indian localities.
- Provides examples of key host-parasite relationships documented in the thesis.
Ecological and Epidemiological Importance of Host Records
This section explains why cataloging host-parasite associations is essential, connecting the thesis work to broader ecological and public health concerns.
“Besides, infected fishes act as a very potent source of helminth infection (to man) through eating fish infected with larval helminths or their adult forms and in some cases, the life cycle of the parasites is incomplete without the help of the fish host.” (Tandon, 1982, p. 1)
The systematic documentation of which parasites infect which hosts, at what intensity, and in which locations is fundamental to understanding fish pathology, public health risks, and aquaculture management. The comprehensive checklist compiled by Tandon provides a historical baseline, allowing future researchers to track changes in parasite prevalence, distribution, and host-switching events over time. Since many fish-borne helminths are zoonotic—meaning they can infect humans—knowing which food fish carry which parasites is vital for public health authorities. Furthermore, understanding the role of a specific fish species in a parasite’s life cycle (e.g., as a second intermediate host for digenetic trematodes) is critical for controlling the spread of the infection within the aquatic ecosystem.
Student Note: Host-parasite checklists are essential tools in epidemiology and conservation biology, indicating the biodiversity of parasites and potential risks of pathogen spillover between wildlife, domestic animals, and humans.
Diversity in Freshwater Fish Host Records
This section focuses on the specific helminth fauna recovered from the freshwater fish species sampled, primarily from the rivers and tanks of Uttar Pradesh.
“A large number of fresh water and marine fishes from local fish market and from various parts of Uttar Pradesh… were, therefore, dissected and the author has succeeded in making a large collection of helminth parasites including Trematodes, Cestodes, Nematodes and Acanthocephala.” (Tandon, 1982, p. 1)
The freshwater component of the study, largely derived from the Gomati and Ganga rivers and associated tanks in the Lucknow and Varanasi areas, revealed a distinct parasite fauna. Hosts like Wallagonia attu (a large catfish) frequently harbored a high diversity and burden of parasites, including the digenetic trematodes Bucephalus octotentacularis n.sp. and Bucephalopsis gaurai, as well as various cestodes and nematodes. Other important hosts included species of Labeo, Channa, and Bagarius bagarius. The prevalence of parasites like Acanthosentis (Acanthocephala) and different families of Trematodes (e.g., Allocreadiidae, Clinostomidae) in these freshwater fishes underscores the complexity of inland water ecosystems in India.
Exam Tip: Freshwater fish, particularly demersal (bottom-dwelling) and piscivorous species, often have a higher incidence of helminths due to consuming infected intermediate hosts (snails, crustaceans) and other fish. Sample Freshwater Host-Parasite Records (Tandon, 1982)
| Fish Host | Parasite Group | Infection Site | Locality (UP) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wallagonia attu | Bucephalidae (Trematoda) | Intestine | Lucknow/Varanasi |
| Bagarius bagarius | Opisthorchis (Trematoda) | Liver/Bile Duct | Lucknow |
| Channa punctata | Eucreadium (Trematoda) | Intestine | Lucknow |
| Puntius sophore | Allocreadium (Trematoda) | Intestine | Lucknow |
| Labeo rohita | Nematodes | Alimentary Canal | Various |
Marine Fish Host Diversity and Records
This section shifts focus to the marine environment, highlighting the diverse hosts and the dominant helminth groups found in the samples from coastal regions.
“A check list of parasites recovered from various fishes is given below, in which the host fishes are arranged family-wise… from various parts of Uttar Pradesh and from Puri, Orissa, Kerala and Pondicherry were, therefore, dissected…” (Tandon, 1982, p. 28, 1)
The marine component of the study, sourcing fish from the Bay of Bengal (Puri, Pondicherry) and the Arabian Sea (Quilon, Kerala), revealed a different assemblage of helminths, dominated by highly complex digenetic trematode families. Hosts included commercially important species like Stromateus cinereus (Pomfret), various species of Caranx (Jack), and smaller coastal fishes like Engraulis (Anchovy). The parasites were often representatives of the Bucephalidae (Gasterostomes), Hemiuridae (which often have everted or simple anterior rhynchus), and Acanthocolpidae families. The sheer taxonomic novelty, with Tandon describing multiple new species from marine hosts, suggests that Indian coastal parasite fauna was, at the time, less comprehensively studied than its freshwater counterpart.
Exam Tip: Marine parasites often show a high degree of host-switching due to the complexity of marine food webs, but also high specificity for intermediate hosts, resulting in diverse parasite fauna in piscivorous marine hosts.
Anatomical Infection Sites and Specificity
This section details the common sites where parasites were recovered in the fish hosts and discusses the concept of site specificity for helminths.
“Trematodes are generally collected from the alimentary canal of the host fish.” (Tandon, 1982, p. 82) … “Helminth parasites which cause deterioration in the food value and in some cases result their mortality.” (Tandon, 1982, p. 1)
The vast majority of the digenetic trematodes and cestodes documented in the thesis were collected from the host’s alimentary canal, including the stomach, pyloric caeca, and various sections of the intestine. The specific location within the canal (e.g., anterior, middle, posterior intestine) is often a critical factor in the parasite’s life strategy and is often highly specific to the species. For instance, some trematodes prefer the highly nutrient-rich anterior intestine, while others cluster in the posterior regions. The thesis also mentions helminths in other sites; for example, some cestodes and larval forms may be found in the coelom, mesenteries, or musculature (which can affect food value), while others like Opisthorchis (though mentioned as Opisthorchis thapari from Bagarius bagarius by Agarwal and Singh in the literature review [p. 27]) would target the bile ducts or liver. This site specificity is crucial for parasite survival, as it optimizes access to food, minimizes exposure to the host’s immune system, and ensures proper environment for reproduction.
Student Note: Always record the exact anatomical site of infection during dissection. This microhabitat is often the most stable feature of a parasite’s ecology and is necessary for accurate diagnosis and host specificity studies.
Author: Vijay Laxmi Tandon, M.Sc., Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, India (as of 1982).
This overview is based on selected excerpts from a historical PhD thesis. It’s intended for educational context, not as a definitive guide to current fish helminthology or host-parasite ecology.
Reviewed and edited by the Professor of Zoology editorial team. Except for direct thesis quotes, all content is original work prepared for educational purposes.
Key Takeaways
- Tandon’s thesis provides a valuable historical checklist of helminth parasites found in Indian freshwater and marine fishes across different localities.
- Documenting host-parasite relationships is crucial for fisheries management, public health, and ecological tracking of parasite spread.
- Freshwater hosts like Wallagonia attu and Bagarius bagarius harbored diverse helminths, including trematodes, cestodes, nematodes, and acanthocephalans.
- Marine fish hosts, including Stromateus and Caranx species, were major sources of new digenetic trematode species (e.g., Bucephalidae, Acanthocolpidae).
- Most helminths recovered in the study exhibited high site specificity, primarily inhabiting the alimentary canal of the fish hosts.
- The infection of food fish with larval helminths was noted as a potential source of human infection.
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)
- Which anatomical site was the primary location for recovering digenetic trematodes in the fish hosts?
- A) Gills
- B) Mesenteries and coelom
- C) Alimentary canal (Intestine/Stomach)
- D) Kidney and spleen
Explanation: The thesis explicitly states that trematodes are generally collected from the alimentary canal of the host fish (Tandon, 1982, p. 82). - Which of the following fish hosts is an example of a freshwater species sampled in the study?
- A) Serranus leopardusB) Stromateus cinereus C) Wallagonia attuD) Caranx kalla
Explanation: Wallagonia attu (catfish) is a prominent freshwater species mentioned in the context of Lucknow and Varanasi sampling, while the others are marine hosts from coastal areas. - The presence of larval helminths in food fish is noted to be a potential source of infection for:
- A) Aquatic birds
- B) Aquatic mammals
- C) Humans
- D) Molluscs
Explanation: The introduction highlights that infected fishes act as a “very potent source of helminth infection (to man)” (Tandon, 1982, p. 1).
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- What is ‘host specificity’?
Host specificity is the degree to which a parasite can successfully develop in different host species; high specificity means a parasite can only infect a few hosts. - What parasite group dominates the marine host records in the thesis?
Digenetic trematodes, particularly from families like Bucephalidae and Acanthocolpidae, appear to dominate the new species described from marine hosts. - What is the significance of the collection localities?
The localities (UP for freshwater; Puri, Kerala, Pondicherry for marine) highlight the wide geographical scope of the study, covering distinct ecological zones. - What non-trematode groups were collected?
Besides trematodes, the collection included Cestodes (tapeworms), Nematodes (roundworms), and Acanthocephala (thorny-headed worms) (Tandon, 1982, p. 1). - Why might a helminth cause fish mortality?
Heavy helminth infections can cause tissue damage, internal hemorrhaging, blockage of the digestive tract, severe inflammation, and secondary bacterial infections, leading to fish death.
Lab / Practical Note
When dissecting a fish to check for helminths, ensure minimal contamination of the coelomic cavity contents with digestive tract material. Use clean saline solution (0.87%) to wash the recovered helminths gently. Process the gut section by section (stomach, pyloric caeca, anterior/mid/posterior intestine), carefully scraping the mucosal lining to ensure all attached parasites are recovered and their precise site of infection is noted.
External Links
Sources & Citation
Primary Source: Tandon, Vijay Laxmi. (1982). Studies on Helminth Parasites of Indian Fishes [PhD Thesis Excerpt, selected pages 1, 27, 28-81 (Checklist), 82]. Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India. Supervisor: Dr. S. P. Gupta.
Note: The specific records cited in the table are representative examples selected from the extensive host-parasite checklist provided across multiple pages (28-81) of the supplied PDF excerpt. Verification of all original records requires the full thesis.
Discover more from Professor Of Zoology
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.