Copepod Community Analysis: PCA, Clustering, and Diversity Indices

Last Updated: November 25, 2025
Estimated reading time: ~7 minutes

Modern ecology has moved far beyond simple species lists; it now relies on robust copepod community analysis to decipher the complex relationships between organisms and their environment. This post explores the advanced statistical frameworks—specifically Diversity Indices, Cluster Analysis, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA)—applied to zooplankton data from the Gujranwala district in Pakistan. By understanding these tools, students can transform raw abundance data into meaningful ecological narratives about stability, pollution, and species coexistence.

Search intent: This post satisfies the user intent to explain statistical methodologies in ecology, analyze community structure data, and apply these concepts to interpret aquatic ecosystem health.

Key Takeaways

  • Diversity Indices: Shannon-Weaver and Simpson indices provided numerical evidence of moderate diversity, signaling potential eutrophication.
  • Cluster Analysis: Dendrograms grouped species into distinct clusters based on abundance, revealing which species share similar ecological niches.
  • PCA Utility: Principal Component Analysis successfully reduced complex datasets, explaining up to 89% of the variance and highlighting seasonal correlations.
  • Abundance Curves: Parabolic abundance curves visually confirmed the dominance of species like Mesocyclops edax.

Diversity Indices and Ecosystem Health

Diversity indices are mathematical tools that condense complex community data into single numbers, allowing for the comparison of different habitats. In this study, the copepod community analysis utilized the Shannon-Weaver Index (H) and Simpson’s Index of Dominance (D) to evaluate four distinct water bodies. The results revealed a “moderate” level of diversity, which is often a red flag for environmental stress or pollution.

“Values of diversity indices showed moderate diversity at all stations throughout the study period indicating that water bodies showed slight unstable physico-chemical parameters. This suggested that, these water bodies are in danger of pollution” (Maqbool, 2012, p. 129).

High values of the Shannon-Weaver index (typically H > 3) indicate clean, stable water, while lower values suggest stress. In this study, values generally ranged between 1.5 and 3.0, peaking in summer months (April/May). This seasonal spike correlates with increased phytoplankton availability, supporting a richer zooplankton community. Conversely, the Simpson Index of Dominance showed an inverse relationship; as diversity increased in summer, dominance decreased, meaning the community was more evenly distributed rather than being overrun by a single species.

Student Note: Evenness (E) is a measure of how similar the abundances of different species are. If one species has 1,000 individuals and ten others have 1 each, Evenness is low, even if Species Richness is 11.

Professor’s Insight: When you see “moderate diversity” in a thesis, usually interpret it as a system in transition—likely suffering from eutrophication (nutrient pollution) but not yet biologically dead.


Cluster Analysis: Grouping Co-occurring Species

Ecologists often need to know which species “hang out” together. Cluster analysis uses algorithms to group species based on similarities in their abundance patterns across time or space. The resulting diagram, called a Dendrogram, visually branches out to show these relationships. In the context of copepod community analysis, this technique helps identify functional groups or guilds that may respond similarly to environmental changes.

“Species present in one cluster were more similar in their abundance as compared to species of other clusters… Cluster 1 contained two species i.e., E. agilis, M. edax” (Maqbool, 2012, p. 36).

At Station 1, the analysis revealed four distinct clusters at a 6% dissimilarity level. The grouping of Eucyclops agilis and Mesocyclops edax in Cluster 1 suggests these dominant species share a high tolerance for the specific conditions of the Nandipur canal and likely have overlapping temporal peaks. Conversely, rare species or those with sporadic appearances (like Eucyclops elegans) grouped separately. This statistical grouping supports the “niche theory”—species in the same cluster likely have similar requirements for temperature, food, and water chemistry, allowing them to coexist or bloom simultaneously.

Student Note: A Dendrogram is a tree-like diagram. The shorter the “arms” (branches) connecting two species, the more statistically similar they are.

Cluster (St. 1)Species IncludedEcological Interpretation
Cluster 1E. agilis, M. edaxDominant, highly abundant residents
Cluster 2D. thomasi, D. bicuspidatusCommon Cyclopoids, likely seasonal co-occurrence
Cluster 3M. fuscus, S. pallidusModerate abundance, specific niche requirements
Cluster 4M. leuckarti, A. venustoidesRare or sporadic occurrences

Fig: Simplified representation of Cluster Analysis results for Station 1 (Data source: Maqbool, 2012).

Professor’s Insight: Cluster analysis is excellent for defining bio-indicator assemblages. Instead of looking for one indicator species, we look for a whole cluster that signifies specific water conditions.


Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

When dealing with 28 species across 12 months and multiple stations, the data becomes multidimensional and hard to visualize. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a technique used in copepod community analysis to reduce this complexity. It creates new variables (Principal Components or PCs) that explain the maximum amount of variance (spread) in the data.

“Three Principal Components were extracted for analyzing copepods of station 1. They constituted 71.015 % of total variance… M. edax heavily loaded on 3rd component” (Maqbool, 2012, p. 37).

The study used Scree plots to determine how many components to keep (eigenvalues > 1). For Station 4, five components explained a massive 89.25% of the total variance. Biplots generated from the PCA showed the relationship between sampling months and species. Species positioned close to specific months on the graph (e.g., summer months) are strongly correlated with that season. This confirms the seasonal succession theories: certain species are “summer species” (loading heavily on components associated with warm months) while others are “winter species.”

Student Note: In a PCA Biplot, the angle between vectors (arrows) matters. An acute angle (<90°) means positive correlation, a 90° angle means no correlation, and an obtuse angle (>90°) means negative correlation.

Professor’s Insight: PCA is the industry standard for “cleaning up” messy ecological data. It separates the “signal” (major trends like seasonality) from the “noise” (random daily fluctuations).


Abundance Curves and Dominance

While complex statistics are powerful, simple graphical representations like abundance curves provide immediate visual insight into community structure. The study plotted abundance curves which typically took a parabolic shape. This shape indicates a community structure where a few species are highly abundant (at the peak), while the majority are rare (at the tails).

“Species present at the top of parabolic curve were highly abundant i.e., M. edax was located at the top of abundance curves of st 1, 2, 4 and E. agilis in abundance curve of st 4” (Maqbool, 2012, p. 37).

This distribution follows the general ecological rule of “few common, many rare.” In disturbed or eutrophic environments, this curve often becomes steeper, as tolerant species (like Mesocyclops edax) explode in number, suppressing the diversity of sensitive species. The parabolic nature of these curves in the Gujranwala study reinforces the findings of the Diversity Indices: a functioning community, but one dominated by a few resilient Cyclopoid species capable of withstanding the local water quality pressures.

Student Note: This is often related to the Rank-Abundance Curve. A steep slope indicates high dominance and low evenness, while a shallow slope indicates high evenness.

Professor’s Insight: Visualizing data is as important as calculating p-values. An abundance curve tells the story of resource monopolization by dominant species at a glance.


thus section should be in uniqe words for each post, Reviewed and edited by the Professor of Zoology editorial team. Except for direct thesis quotes, all content is original work prepared for educational purposes.


Real-Life Applications

Statistical analysis in ecology is not just academic; it powers environmental management.

  1. Water Quality Monitoring: Agencies use indices like Shannon-Weaver to assign a “health score” to rivers. A sudden drop in this index (as calculated in this study) triggers pollution investigations.
  2. Fisheries Management: PCA helps fisheries managers understand which environmental factors (temperature, conductivity) drive the abundance of zooplankton (fish food). This allows for predictive modeling of fish stock health based on water data.
  3. Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA): Before building dams or factories (like the power plant mentioned near Nandipur canal), Cluster Analysis is used to establish a “baseline” community structure. Post-construction monitoring checks if the species “clusters” have shifted, indicating ecological damage.

Exam Relevance: You may be asked to “Interpret a value of H = 1.8 vs H = 3.5.” Linking lower numbers to pollution/stress is the key application skill.


Key Takeaways

  • Statistical Evidence: The study relies on ANOVA, Pearson Correlation, PCA, and Clustering to validate biological observations.
  • Moderate Diversity: Indices (H ~1.8–2.8) suggest the water bodies are moderately diverse but facing eutrophication pressures.
  • Statistical Grouping: Cluster analysis proved that species don’t distribute randomly; they form associations based on shared abundance patterns.
  • Variance Explained: PCA is highly effective for this type of data, explaining up to ~89% of biological variance at some stations.
  • Dominance Illustrated: Abundance curves visually confirmed Mesocyclops edax as the ecological dominant across most sites.

MCQs

1. In Principal Component Analysis (PCA), what does it mean if two species vectors have a very small angle (acute) between them?
A. They are negatively correlated.
B. They are positively correlated.
C. They have no relationship.
D. They are from different genera.
Correct: B
Difficulty: Moderate
Explanation: In a PCA biplot, vectors pointing in the same direction (small angle) indicate a strong positive correlation between those variables (species).

2. A Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index (H) value of 1.5 usually indicates:
A. Very high diversity and pristine water.
B. Moderate to low diversity, possibly polluted.
C. A community with zero species.
D. A dominance of Calanoid copepods.
Correct: B
Difficulty: Easy
Explanation: H values >3 usually indicate high diversity. Values between 1 and 3 are moderate; values closer to 1 indicate stress or pollution (Maqbool, 2012, p. 23).

3. What is the primary purpose of a Dendrogram in ecological studies?
A. To measure the pH of water.
B. To visualize the evolutionary history of a single species.
C. To visualize clusters of species based on similarity in abundance.
D. To calculate the total biomass of zooplankton.
Correct: C
Difficulty: Moderate
Explanation: The study used dendrograms in Cluster Analysis to group copepod species into clusters based on their abundance similarities (Maqbool, 2012, p. 36).


FAQs

Q: What is the difference between Species Richness and Species Evenness?
A: Richness is simply the count of different species present. Evenness measures how equal the abundances of those species are. A community can be rich (many species) but uneven (dominated by one species).

Q: Why do we use PCA instead of just looking at graphs?
A: Biological data is multivariate (many species, many months, many parameters). PCA reduces these many dimensions into a few “Principal Components” that are easier to visualize and interpret without losing much information.

Q: What does a “significant difference” in ANOVA mean for this study?
A: It means the variation in copepod density between months was too large to be random chance. It statistically confirms that seasonality (time of year) genuinely affects population numbers.


Lab / Practical Note

Data Handling: When performing statistical analysis on biological data, always “normalize” or log-transform your abundance counts (e.g., Log(n+1)) before running PCA. This prevents highly abundant species (like Mesocyclops) from completely skewing the results and hiding trends in rarer species.



External Resources


Sources & Citations

Thesis Citation:
Studies on Abundance and Diversity of Copepods from Fresh waters, Asma Maqbool, Supervisor: Dr. Abdul Qayyum Khan Sulehria, GC University Lahore, Pakistan, Session 2009-2012 (Submitted ~2017).

Corrections:
If you are the author of this thesis and wish to submit corrections, please contact us at contact@professorofzoology.com.

Note: Placeholder tokens and formatting artifacts from the PDF conversion process were removed for clarity.


Author Box

Author: Asma Maqbool, Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Zoology, GC University Lahore.
Reviewer: Abubakar Siddiq

Note: This summary was assisted by AI and verified by a human editor.

Disclaimer: This article interprets complex statistical data for educational purposes; methodologies may vary by software and specific research context.



Discover more from Professor Of Zoology

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top