Table of Contents
Biological Control of Mung Bean Pests: Are We Harming Our Best Allies?
Last Updated: August 10, 2025
The Unseen Workforce: Leveraging Biological Control for Mung Bean Pests
What if the most powerful pest control agents on your farm weren’t found in a chemical container, but were already there, working tirelessly for free? This is the core principle of biological control of mung bean pests, a strategy that relies on nature’s own system of checks and balances. In every field, there exists an army of beneficial insects, or “natural enemies,” that prey on the very pests that threaten our crops.
However, the widespread use of synthetic pesticides can inadvertently wipe out these valuable allies, sometimes making pest problems even worse. This article delves into a crucial part of a two-year thesis from Rajasthan that investigated this very issue. We will explore how different pesticides—both synthetic and botanical—affect the population of one of the most important beneficial insects in the mung bean ecosystem: the green lacewing.
The Unsung Heroes: Identifying Natural Enemies in Mung Bean Fields
Before we can protect them, we must understand who they are and the critical role they play. A natural enemy is simply an organism that feeds on another, and “beneficial insects are those that feed on pests” (p. 10). Harnessing these predators is a key component of modern sustainable farming, known as Integrated Pest Management (IPM). The thesis emphasizes that “biological control is a crucial component of IPM” (p. 11).
The danger of ignoring this natural workforce is significant. The use of broad-spectrum pesticides can “trigger an epidemic of other pests due to the chemical elimination of crucial natural enemies” (p. 11). When predators are removed, pest populations can rebound faster and stronger than before. This makes it essential to understand how our interventions impact the entire ecosystem.
Spotlight on a Key Ally for Biological Control: The Green Lacewing
Among the many predators, one stands out for its voracious appetite and effectiveness against a wide range of mung bean pests. The study identifies the green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) as a star player in the field. The researcher notes that “Lacewing is the most significant biocontrol agent for sucking insect pests among the many predator species” (p. 11).
The sheer variety of pests that lacewing larvae consume is astounding. Their diet includes some of the most destructive mung bean pests: “Whiteflies, aphids, thrips, spider mites (particularly red mites), moths, leaf hoppers, leaf miners’ eggs, beetle larvae, tiny caterpillars, and the tobacco budworm have all been described as prey” (p. 12). This impressive list highlights just how valuable a healthy green lacewing population is for natural, effective pest management.
The Critical Experiment: How Pesticides Affect Green Lacewing Populations
Knowing the importance of the green lacewing, the researchers designed an experiment to measure the real-world impact of common pest control methods on its population. The study’s aim was to observe the “effect of synthetic pesticides and botanicals on the population of beneficial insect, grub of green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea)” during the 2019 and 2020 Kharif seasons (p. 164).
The experiment compared two synthetic pesticides, thiamethoxam and emamectin benzoate, against three botanical extracts: neem, turmeric, and clove. Researchers carefully counted the population of lacewing grubs before the sprays and then again at 7 and 14 days after application to measure any decline in their numbers.
The Results: Which Pesticides Disrupt the Biological Control of Mung Bean Pests?
The data collected over two years painted a very clear picture of which treatments were harmful and which were safer for this beneficial insect.
In 2019, the pre-treatment population of lacewing grubs “ranged from 1.80 to 2.10 grubs/5plants” (p. 164). Just seven days after spraying, the plots treated with synthetic pesticides saw a sharp decline. The populations in the thiamethoxam and emamectin benzoate plots were observed at 1.20 and 1.30 grubs/5plants, respectively (p. 164). In stark contrast, the plots treated with botanicals retained a much healthier population of these predators. The neem extract plots had 1.50 grubs/5plants, followed by turmeric (1.60) and clove (1.80) (p. 164).
The 2020 study season confirmed this trend. Pre-treatment populations were similar, ranging from “1.90 to 2.10 grubs/5plants” (p. 168). Again, after 7 days, the synthetic pesticide plots showed the lowest lacewing populations, while the botanical plots were significantly higher.
Toxicity Verdict: A Clear Distinction for Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
The conclusion from this extensive data was unambiguous. The study found that “thiamethoxam and emamectin benzoate were observed moderately toxic while, neem, turmeric and clove extract found least toxic against the population of grub of green lacewing” (p. 196).
This finding has profound implications for farmers practicing IPM. A successful IPM strategy depends on the careful integration of different control methods. The thesis underscores this by stating, “Understanding the effects of pesticides on natural enemies is critical for integrating these two techniques (chemical and biological control)” (p. 11). The data specifically identified one synthetic pesticide as being particularly harmful, noting, “According to present study, thiamethoxam was found more toxic as compare to other treatments and control” (p. 177).
Choosing a pesticide is not just about killing pests; it’s about selecting a tool that does the job while preserving the beneficial insects that provide continuous, free pest control.
Conclusion
This research provides compelling evidence that our pest control choices have direct consequences for the biological control of mung bean pests. While synthetic pesticides like thiamethoxam and emamectin benzoate are effective against pests, they come at the cost of harming crucial allies like the green lacewing. In contrast, botanical solutions like neem, turmeric, and clove extract prove to be far less toxic, allowing these beneficial predators to thrive. For a truly sustainable and resilient farming system, protecting our natural allies isn’t just an option—it’s a necessity.
Sources & Citations
- Thesis Title: Study and Possible Control Measures for Insect Pests of Mung Bean in Rajasthan
- Researcher: Anand Kumar Prajapat
- Guide (Supervisor): Dr. Lekhu Gehlot
- University: Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur
- Year of Compilation: 2022
- Excerpt Page Numbers: 10, 11, 12, 164, 166, 168, 169, 177, 196.
Disclaimer: Some sentences have been lightly edited for SEO and readability. For the full, original research, please refer to the complete thesis PDF linked in the section above.
How do you support beneficial insect populations on your farm or in your garden? Share your strategies in the comments below!
Discover more from Professor Of Zoology
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
