Upper vs Lower IVRA in Cattle: A Definitive Clinical Comparison
Table of Contents
Introduction
When performing surgery on a bovine limb, Intravenous Regional Anesthesia (IVRA) is an indispensable technique. However, IVRA is not a one-size-fits-all procedure; practitioners can choose between two primary approaches: an “upper” block applied higher up the limb or a “lower” block applied more distally.
This choice has significant implications for drug dosage, safety, and overall efficacy. The central question for any veterinarian is which technique is superior for common procedures like hoof surgery. This article provides a head-to-head comparison of upper vs lower IVRA in cattle, drawing on direct evidence from a master’s thesis to help you make an informed clinical decision.
An Original Excerpt on Upper vs Lower IVRA in Cattle
(The following is an excerpt adapted from a thesis for clarity and online readability. The full citation is provided below.)
Comparing the Methodologies: Upper vs Lower IVRA in Cattle
The fundamental difference in the upper vs lower IVRA in cattle lies in the placement of the tourniquet and the subsequent volume and location of the anesthetic injection.
The Upper IVRA Technique
In the upper IVRA protocol, the limb was shaved below the level of the knee or hock. A tourniquet was placed circumferentially in the middle of the metatarsus or metacarpus. Following this, a butterfly cannula was placed in the radial vein, and the full dose of the anesthetic agent was injected. This approach anesthetizes a larger portion of the distal limb. In this study, the upper IVRA groups (I and II) received a higher dose of anesthetic agents:
- Group I: Lignocaine @ 4mg/kg
- Group II: Lignocaine @ 4mg/kg + Ketamine @ 3.0mg/kg
The Lower IVRA Technique
For the lower IVRA protocol, the limb was shaved below the pastern joint. An elastic tourniquet was applied just below the pastern joint and distal to the dew claws. The axial digital vein was then catheterized, and blood was drained from the distal extremity before injection. This technique targets a more localized area, specifically the foot and pastern region. A key advantage in this upper vs lower IVRA in cattle comparison is that the lower technique used half the dose of anesthetics:
- Group III: Lignocaine @ 2mg/kg
- Group IV: Lignocaine @ 2mg/kg + Ketamine @ 1.5mg/kg
Clinical Showdown: Results of Upper vs Lower IVRA in Cattle
When directly comparing the results, a clear pattern of efficacy and safety emerged between the two techniques.
Anesthetic Onset and Recovery
A faster onset time is often desirable to begin a procedure promptly. The study found that the lower IVRA technique with ketamine (Group IV) had the fastest sensory block onset time (3.33 minutes), slightly faster than the upper IVRA with ketamine (Group II, 3.50 minutes). Both were significantly faster than the lignocaine-only groups.
For recovery, a longer duration provides better post-procedural pain control. The motor block recovery time was longest in the lower IVRA with ketamine group (Group IV, 69.16 minutes), indicating a longer-lasting effect despite the lower drug dose. The upper IVRA with ketamine (Group II) was a close second at 68.16 minutes. This suggests that the lower technique can provide comparable, if not superior, duration of action with less anesthetic agent.
Safety and Complications
Perhaps the most critical factor in the upper vs lower IVRA in cattle debate is patient safety. No severe signs of cardiovascular or CNS toxicity were noted in any group. However, minor, transient complications were exclusively observed in the upper IVRA with ketamine group (Group II). These included slight stumbling, a temporary increase in heart rate (tachycardia), and prostration for 5-6 minutes after the procedure.
In stark contrast, the lower IVRA groups (III and IV) and the upper IVRA lignocaine-only group (I) did not show any sign of toxicity. The absence of any complications in the lower IVRA with ketamine group (Group IV) is particularly noteworthy, as it achieved excellent anesthetic efficacy without the minor side effects seen in its high-dose upper-limb counterpart.
Final Verdict and Recommendations
Based on the evidence gathered in this comprehensive study, a clear conclusion can be drawn in the upper vs lower IVRA in cattle comparison.
The lower IVRA technique, using half the dose of anesthetics compared to the upper IVRA, was found to be perfectly suitable and effective for hoof examination and surgery. The efficacy of the lower IVRA technique using a combination of lignocaine and ketamine (Group IV) was deemed the highest of all groups. This protocol was found to be safe, improving the quality of anesthesia without inducing significant clinical side effects.
Therefore, the study recommends that while both techniques are suitable, the lower IVRA technique using a combination of lignocaine and ketamine is the best option. It can be used for hoof and claw examination and surgery in bovines without any significant side effects or risk of toxicity, primarily because it reduces the required dose of lidocaine and ketamine.
Conclusion
In the clinical debate of upper vs lower IVRA in cattle, the evidence from this research points to a clear winner for routine hoof procedures. The lower IVRA technique emerges as the superior method, offering a trifecta of benefits: it requires only half the anesthetic dose, it provides a rapid onset and long duration of action, and it demonstrates a cleaner safety profile with no observed complications.
By choosing a lower block with a lignocaine-ketamine combination, veterinarians can achieve excellent surgical conditions while minimizing drug exposure and risk to the animal, representing a significant refinement in bovine anesthetic practice.
Source Citation:
- Researcher: Dr. Vipin Kumar Yadav
- Thesis Title: Comparative Studies on Upper versus Lower Intravenous Regional Anesthesia (IVRA) Using Lignocaine and Its Combination with Ketamine in Bovines
- Guide: Dr. A. K. Gangwar
- University: Narendra Dev University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad (U.P.)-India
- Completion Date: 2018
- Excerpted From: Pages 34, 54, 60, 73, 75-76
Disclaimer:
Disclaimer: Some sentences have been lightly edited for SEO and readability. For the complete and original research, please refer to the full thesis PDF above.
Which IVRA technique do you prefer in your practice and why? Share your clinical experience with upper vs. lower blocks in the comments below. Be sure to share this definitive comparison with colleagues and students.
Discover more from Professor Of Zoology
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.